2020 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark launches

Notes to editors: About the 2020 CHRB: Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, CHRB adapted its approach in 2020 for companies in the agricultural products, apparel, extractives and ICT manufacturing sectors. These companies were assessed on a subset of the CHRB methodology, namely 13 indicators that reflect the three key areas of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: high-level commitments, human rights due diligence, and access to remedy. Automotive companies, assessed for the first time this year, were ranked according to the full CHRB methodology, available here. As in previous years, all companies assessed had the opportunity to review their draft assessment, provide feedback and seek clarification from the CHRB team before their scores were finalised for publication. The research, delivered with our partner EIRIS Foundation and supported by RepRisk (a provider of ESG risk metrics and analytics for the CHRB serious allegations), is based on public information and is made freely available to all interested stakeholders. About the World Benchmarking Alliance: The private sector has a crucial role to play in advancing the SDGs, but to boost companies’ motivation, there needs to be real change in the way that their impact is measured. WBA is benchmarking companies to compare performance on the global challenges the world faces. In January 2020 WBA announced the SDG2000 most influential companies by impact on the UN’s SDGs to benchmark up to 2023. WBA will act as an independent, transparent body with a broad group of 170+ Allies to be a successful driver of change. The benchmarks free and publicly available to all will empower all stakeholders, from consumers and investors to employees and business leaders, with key data and insights to encourage sustainable business practices across all sectors. [www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org](http://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org) -------------------- Global companies still falling short on human rights, despite mounting pressure \- Too many companies still fail to demonstrate human rights due diligence, despite investor calls for urgent improvement. \- A growing number of companies, including Unilever, Adidas, ENI and Ericsson, are getting better at the fundamentals. However, the majority still lag behind, with companies such as Starbucks, Ross Stores and Phillips 66 not improving. \- Ford Motors, Groupe PSA and Daimler lead the newly assessed automotive sector with scores ranging from 30% to 42%. But the sector joins CHRB as the lowest performing ever, with Great Wall Motor, SAIC Motor, Chongqing Changan and FAW Car Company scoring under 1%. London, 16th November 2020: The World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA) has today launched its fourth edition of the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB) assessing 230 of the world’s most influential companies on their human rights disclosures. Nearly half of the global companies assessed are failing to demonstrate they are conducting human rights due diligence in line with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. This is deeply concerning, given that human rights due diligence is at the heart of any good approach to managing human rights and is essential for companies to drive sustainable change and support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Camille Le Pors, CHRB Lead at WBA said: "There is a concerningly large group of companies who have made little to no progress in the last 12 months. We’re sensing a real reluctance from the laggards to improve. When we look at the companies assessed for the first time this year, 70% failed to score any points on human rights due diligence. While a small group of companies are demonstrating strong commitment and processes, it’s not always clear that these deliver their intended effects. Clearly, businesses alone won’t raise the bar and with COVID-19’s compounding impact, there is a real need for regulatory action, as planned by the European Union, as well as increased investor pressure to force change." Following the 2019 edition of WBA’s CHRB, 95 companies were targeted by a joint statement from a group of 176 investors for scoring zero on all human rights due diligence indicators. Of these, 79 are still scoring zero in 2020. Marte Borhaug, Global Head of Sustainable Outcomes at Aviva Investors, a founding member of the CHRB, said: "Despite some progress, too many of the world’s largest companies are failing to meet investor expectations on human rights issues, especially around due diligence in their supply chains. This lack of improvement is unacceptable, and these companies should be required to explain to investors, as well as other stakeholder groups, why their disclosures on such an important topic are so poor. The societal, financial and moral imperative is clear – the global business community needs to step up its game if we want to have any chance of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals by the 2030 deadline." The Automotive sector, included for the first time this year, is the worst performing industry ever to be ranked by CHRB, exposing the sector’s failure to manage or even adequately track human rights risks in supply chains. Not a single automotive maker scored above 50%, and half of the 30 companies assessed scored below 10%. A just transition is undermined by a disconnect between human rights and climate issues. The 30 automotive companies researched by CHRB were also assessed by WBA’s Climate and Energy Benchmark, which shows that much more needs to be done to achieve the UN Paris Agreement goals in time by setting ambitious emissions targets. Most automotive companies that demonstrated action on climate issues disclosed very little, if any, information on how they manage human rights, and vice versa. Vicky Sins, who leads the Decarbonisation and Energy Transformation at WBA, said: "This is extremely alarming as a distinct requirement of the UN Paris Agreement is to achieve a ‘just transition’; a future where no one is left behind in the movement towards a net zero-carbon economy. Without consideration for human rights, we will only exacerbate existing inequalities and increase the potential for exploitation of already vulnerable groups." WBA´s Automotive Benchmark, developed in partnership with CDP & ADEME using the ACT methodologies launched last year, and the 2020 update is available here. The full 2020 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, including a sector breakdown and individual company scorecards, is publicly available here. p/o Virginie Gastine Menou RISQUES ET VOUS Proposer une offre de job : Consulter les offres qui vous correspondent :